[shhrubbery!]

Pretty picture, but no cigar. Instead of getting into a lengthy argument, I simply refer you to the excellent replies already made to your post by Remedy and Dataman, in your linked thread.

Darwinism and its fraternal twin, Marxism, are quasi-religions: Neither is based in verified scientific fact, despite the protestations of their adherents; and it requires a leap of faith to believe in them. (And, in the case of macroevolution, a lot of circular thinking.)

[Dataman]

Pretty picture, but no cigar.

Thanks for the ping. You are correct. If there actually was a substantial link between the lower primates and man, the darwinists would beat us all to death with it. As it is, all they have is pictures, imaginations and materialistic presuppositions.

[Dataman]

I went back and reread most of that old thread. It was entertaining. I don't think Retro is doing himself any favors by linking to it. The evos were not doing very well at all, were they?

[PatrickHenry]

Darwinism and its fraternal twin, Marxism, are quasi-religions: Neither is based in verified scientific fact, despite the protestations of their adherents; and it requires a leap of faith to believe in them. (And, in the case of macroevolution, a lot of circular thinking.)

A most extra-ordinary post. In a few sentences you've managed to cram in more creationoid nonsense than I've encountered anywhere else. Your grasp of evolution theory approches absolute zero. Which is a great opportunity for you.

If you have any spark of curiousity, I invite you to read my tagline, and then to peruse some of the links that are neatly organized at my homepage.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Darwinism and its fraternal twin, Marxism, are quasi-religions:...

Marxism actually finds it's roots in Christianity. It started with Thomas More's Utopia, and found expression in the Biblical communism of Americans in the 1800's.