Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArcLight

What it shows is that, depsite some misgivings, including my own, about electronic voting machines, they are much less susceptible to vote fraud than paper ballots, which can be bulk-punched thereby producing the infamous "hanging chads."

Bush won bigger where fraud was less.


96 posted on 11/18/2004 2:07:30 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
No ... they were less susceptible to fraud.

Or, as others have noted above, apparently the 'Rats haven't figured out how to cheat on them ... yet.

We still need to improve the e-voting machines. They should have an auditable paper trail, for instance. The software on both the machine in the booth and the collection servers needs better auditing.

Like counterfeiting currency, this will be a never ending battle, between the white hats and the black hats. There is way too much power and money flowing threw our government for the black hats to stop trying to control elections.

120 posted on 11/18/2004 6:11:27 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Welcome home, Vietnam Vets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson