Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
If I had to choose between Spector and changing the filibuster rule for nominees, I would rather get the filibuster rule changed. That rule is the main way democrats can stop Bush. They will use it even under the threat that they may get thrown out in the next election (lose even more seats in the red states).
45 posted on 11/18/2004 11:23:37 AM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Hendrix
I agree with you. The filibuster rules change is THE issue.

With Specter's impact rendered insignificant in the new Senate by virtue of the new number of seats gained by the Republicans, then the chairman's seat is unimportant. It was a good strategy, though, to highlight the real issue.

We must fight for the rules change in emails to Frist & our senators.

We must also fight for the most friendly division of seats on ALL COMMITTEES, not just the Judiciary. If the difference before was one seat, then the difference now should be Plus 3X that amount. 51-48 = 3 Seat Difference. 55-45 = 10 Seat Difference. That is a HUGE 333% Difference. A Former 1 Seat difference should now be a 4 seat difference. We get the former seat by virtue of the fraction that belongs to the victor; i.e., 1+3.

54 posted on 11/18/2004 11:35:30 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson