That's a...creative interpretation. It could also have something to do with Americans wanting tax cuts and dead terrorists. Bush is not a theocrat, regardless of what you and the moonbat left would like to believe.
The people who created GTA have targetted your child. So censorship is how parents fight back.
So you advocate responding to the fake violence of video games with the actual violence of censorship. Not exactly consistent with limited government, free markets, or individual responsibility, is it?
it's about cultural conservatism and moral values not about abolishing ego shooters ... in GTA you act as a criminal in a virtual world and with nearly every action in that "world" you violate fundamental rules of our society. what if a game in which you can act as terrorist is the next to be produced? where are the limits? and finally: do you believe that people wouldn't play a game with the same quality! if they have to hunt down terrorists or criminals (and not the innocent)?