Posted on 11/18/2004 7:46:33 AM PST by gopwinsin04
You have been forewarned.
.
.
.
.
.
The CNN anchor just had Gen Weasel Clark on.....and he mentioned to Clark that it was just a bad designed and ugly looking building...
And Clark...(who was turned down for his 3rd and 4th stars and would not have gotten them had Clinton not pulled some strings)...was quick to say that it was a wonderful structure.
Weasel Clark is such a pathetic political whore.
He was the same when he was in the Army.
bump for virtual library
You'll have to stand at the back of a long line for your wishes to be granted...as those who *did* vote for him will no doubt be higher up in the line than those who didn't vote for him.
That's what not voting, or not voting for someone means, yes?! That you don't want favors from that politician or at least that you aren't owed any such favors.
So those things that you value...were lost...because you didn't vote for the winner.
In America, we call that: losing.
Yep... and that's why close to 62 Million voted for President Bush
"I wonder if the El Camino with the astroturf bedliner has its own exhibit."
It's behind the doublewide sittin' on cinder blocks with an old sofa in the back.
It is NOT President Bush's job to trash xlinton.........he's done that himself.
If you listen carefully enough, he isn't really saying anything good about the man himself, or his wife.
You'll feel better if you stop waiting for our President to act beneath his office and himself.
batteries... I get it. ha ha
Who are you claiming lauded Arafat?
It looks like ole Bill is sticking out those lips as far as possible so as to have as little physical contact as possible!!!
"That you don't want favors from that politician or at least that you aren't owed any such favors."
What a wonderful description of how far we've fallen from the days of "Of the people, by the people, and for the people"
Now it's "of the government, by the elites, and for themselves"
"Here's the geeees. The geeeeeeeees!"
Really? Who was saying Bush was not nuanced ever? Why do you say "now" and who was saying it was a "serious character flaw"?
Not his supporters.
The only ones saying he was simple and not nuanced were......Kerryites.
Is that what you are?
Don't get me wrong. Bush does not have to be crude.
(I think Armybratcutie does not feel Bush has to be crude either).
Just think he does not have to give any compliments.
Just go there and say.....congrats on your new library...and leave it at that.
People are saying that GW said a lot of nice "nothings" and so it is not complimentary. Well....he still gave compliments. He does not have to be overly nice...to look Presidential.
Being nice to democraps never pays off. They just come back with crude remarks and bad actions. Klintoon's speech today.....is proof of that.
Dang--if I were you, I don't know if I would get up in the morning. Life is just a bowl of s**t for you isn't it.
In addition to THAT, he's protecting your sorry behind from terrorists, and YOU say he's bound for the 'ash-heap of history.'
I'm sorry, Hank, but that's really funny!!
Old Cracker, that doesnt fit this post... I am saying, OK Pres Bush went to represent the office, BUT he DID NOT have to praise Clinton like he was his best friend, WHICH he did, twice counting the unveiling ceremony... There was a lot he could have said without all that praise... he could have been nice, but not sound like they were buddies WHICH HE DID... Clinton got two or three digs in about Pres Bush... which is prezactly my point...
but its over...no big deal............I just dont get it myself......
Absolutely perfect.
How does saying "God bless his soul" laud the man? What specific praise was given to Arafat?
< /crickets >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.