Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: callmejoe
But my point was to focus on a potentially imminent scenario, not a flu strain. I was making a point about manufactured bioweapons in general, not natural flu pandemics in particular.

Bioweapons are older than nuclear weapons. They are not something that we've just awakened to. Same for more 'natural' flu. A decade or so ago it was the Hong Kong flu that was to devistate the world - yet we survived. Every year there is a strange virus that appears and is going to affect millions. There is a degree that awareness and research are necessary. On the other hand, there is a lot of what I see as scare mongering as it is a vehicle for more money. The problem for most bioweapons is that once you release them, you are at almost as much risk as your target. Not much reason to try to rule the world if you are dead due to your own virus.

3,617 posted on 12/19/2004 7:50:13 PM PST by Godzilla (I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3602 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla

Not much reason to try to rule the world if
you are dead due to your own virus.




The first thoughts that came to mind on reading this:

Die from a virus or strap on a suicide belt?

Dead is dead.

Vaccination, could offer some protection to the person releasing the germs.


3,631 posted on 12/19/2004 9:19:53 PM PST by nw_arizona_granny (Today, please pray for God's miracle, we are not going to make it without him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3617 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson