Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: subsea06; Godzilla

"Perhaps the idea was to let it get sucked through the intakes and into the steam generator, where the T/P would
ignite the the phosphorus... I believe Surry is a PWR."

Wouldn't it make more sense if it was just a flare for the sake of being a flare for an intended drop (people or device?) that was foiled? Or for a covert training op from Ft. Eustace?


3,552 posted on 12/19/2004 7:35:11 AM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3492 | View Replies ]


To: Domestic Church

You may well be right that it the WP flare was just so much flotsam.

As to the idea of using a WP on a covert op, you ever see one of these go off?? I don't think of a 'WP' and 'covert' in the same thought sequence.

sub6


3,604 posted on 12/19/2004 5:55:13 PM PST by subsea06 (A simple guy living in a complicated world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3552 | View Replies ]

To: Domestic Church
Wouldn't it make more sense if it was just a flare for the sake of being a flare for an intended drop (people or device?) that was foiled? Or for a covert training op from Ft. Eustace?

That is part of my initial thoughts. However, to pop a flare is to draw attention to one's presence therefore why would one have one to begin with if the plan is to be covert or relying upon stealth.

3,615 posted on 12/19/2004 7:31:18 PM PST by Godzilla (I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3552 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson