To validate the plausibility of a story, one must look at points that can be confirmed or denied. These act as a linchpin, if the story cannot hold up under these known circumstances, the rest is likely to be shaky as well. As I mentioned in my first post, his story brutally fails the fact test regarding who devised and conducted the 911 and Madrid Spain attacks. Upon this foundation his story crumbles.
His rumblings about 'hidden hand' etc almost make we want to purchase tinfoil stock with reynolds. He lays it on thick and heavy like it is taken out of a fiction novel. However, I know that our secure communications when I was in Germany were SECURE. He talks big, but put the hip boots on because it is mostly cow manure.
"...want to purchase tinfoil stock with reynolds"
Can't do that...reynolds was bought out by alcoa a few years back.(reading the thread backwards here to find out more about the hidden hand;)