Skip to comments.
CA: Rollback of Wild Land Protection Gets Support
LA Times ^
| 11/17/04
| Bettina Boxell
Posted on 11/17/2004 9:20:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge
The Schwarzenegger administration signaled its support Tuesday for a plan to drop Clinton-era protections that barred road-building and other development on nearly a third of the country's national forest land, including more than 4 million acres in California.
The rollback, proposed by the Bush administration last summer, would repeal the most ambitious conservation move of Clinton's presidency a rule that blocked commercial timber cutting and road construction on 58.5 million acres of national forest holdings.
In its place, the Bush proposal would create a system that relies heavily on individual states to decide whether the forest lands should be opened to development or remain roadless.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; environment; gets; logging; protection; rollback; support; usfs; wildland
To: farmfriend
To: NormsRevenge; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
3
posted on
11/18/2004 8:53:04 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: NormsRevenge; Carry_Okie
Well... It's sort of a start, I guess, maybe...
4
posted on
11/18/2004 8:55:50 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
("Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater when he was in his right mind)
To: SierraWasp
The Schwarzenegger administration signaled its support... for
...a system that relies heavily on individual states to decide whether the forest lands should be opened to development or remain roadless.
And from another thread,
Chief Dale Bosworth rejected appeals by environmental groups, prompting immediate promises of lawsuits as the administrative process grinds to an end. Regional Forester Jack Blackwell said the plan he approved in January will improve wildlife habitat while reducing fire danger particularly around mountain communities.
Environmental critics called it a veiled effort to triple logging across 11 national forests,
So, Arnold and his greenie friends get to call the shots no matter what Jack Blackwell says?
Good for Arizona and Colorado, not good for us.
5
posted on
11/18/2004 9:04:54 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Privatizing environmental regulation is critical to national survival.)
To: Carry_Okie
But... But... But... The article is trying to intimate that Arnold and the environerds are developing a split and acting like "girlie men!"
6
posted on
11/18/2004 9:12:52 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
("Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater when he was in his right mind)
To: SierraWasp
The enviros are protesting the Bush move because it's not total control of ALL states. They will sue Blackwell in California anyway.
7
posted on
11/18/2004 9:17:51 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Privatizing environmental regulation is critical to national survival.)
To: farmfriend
8
posted on
11/19/2004 3:03:59 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: NormsRevenge; farmfriend; countrydummy; Carry_Okie
9
posted on
11/19/2004 4:36:05 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
To: sauropod
I'm not sure you get it. It may be federalism, which is good, but allowing California to go its own way will guarantee that the greenies consolidate their power here.
Haltering the California economy isn't "Good, good, good."
10
posted on
11/19/2004 7:22:54 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Privatizing environmental regulation is critical to national survival.)
To: Carry_Okie
The Schwarzenegger administration signaled its support Tuesday for a plan to drop Clinton-era protections that barred road-building and other development on nearly a third of the country's national forest land, including more than 4 million acres in California. Oh, I get it alright. Anything that chokes off the "Roadless Area Initiative" is god, good, good. If one state tells the fascist fedgov to go pound sand, I'm all for it.
11
posted on
11/19/2004 4:57:35 PM PST
by
sauropod
(Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson