It is not me who is conflating. It is the evolutionist. What "living matter" could possibly be present at The Big Bang? Doesn't evolutionary theory surmise life somehow formed later out of some primordial soup? From whence did it come?
Why does this long-abandoned chestnut of creationism keep rearing its head?
Please inform us all when the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics were debunked, by whom, and how?
Unless, of course, one looks looks up from the Bible now and again and takes a peek at the very world that God created.
I do so every day, and am grateful. Frankly, He is under no obligation to tell us everything. But, He has told us enough that we can understand just what He has done.
Do you presume that everything God has to say he's already said?
I'm not sure what you mean by this statement. If you mean if Scripture is now complete (but still unfulfilled), yes. If you mean when we someday stand face to face with Him, no.
I look forward to that day in due time. Do you?
Yikes. It is considered good form to know the rudiments of the topic under debate. Please learn them.
Please inform us all when the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics were debunked, by whom, and how?
Oh honestly. You stated that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics contradict evolution. That particular bit of drivel has been so thoroughly parsed and discredited it is now considered by creationists themselves to be an embarrassing assertion. Yet you persist in using it. Do you feel that a smattering of dishonesty is justifiable to achieve your goals? And just what goal are you hoping to achieve? Temporary conversion of a few gullibles?
I'm not sure what you mean by this statement. If you mean if Scripture is now complete (but still unfulfilled), yes.
Frankly, you give every appearance of worshiping the Bible, not God.
If you mean when we someday stand face to face with Him, no. I look forward to that day in due time. Do you?
Self-congratulatory piety coupled with smarmy condemnation. Duly noted.