To: AndrewC
Could it be that no questioning of the status quo is allowed? Not even a label? How about the fact that the pledge of allegiance is attacked in court? Or the symbols of religion? Does that not set a climate for what is happening? And it is not just Christians who think that the theory as espoused is flawed.
Notice that your scientist didn't use bible verses or theology to challenge evolution. Regardless, he doesn't really challenge the Theory of Evolution, but only some of its advocates.
Of course the theory will evolve and become more robust as more and more research is done. This is done with any theory and certainly doesn't put the theory itself into question. Its just the scientific method.
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Very late ping. This thread popped up after my bedtime.
Evolution Ping! This list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and maybe other science topics like cosmology.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
103 posted on
11/18/2004 3:27:58 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(The all-new List-O-Links for evolution threads is now in my freeper homepage.)
To: JeffAtlanta
Regardless, he doesn't really challenge the Theory of Evolution, but only some of its advocates. You have not been here long enough to have seen evidence counter to your statement. He evidently is a challenge to the status quo because of the attacks on him. It is sufficient to observe the reactions of the evolutionists here and elsewhere to see that the theory has flaws in it that they seek to ignore.
147 posted on
11/18/2004 4:48:44 PM PST by
AndrewC
(New Senate rule -- Must vote on all Presidential appointments period certain.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson