Posted on 11/17/2004 5:28:42 PM PST by lt.america
Every time I see that picture it makes me want to find the closest liberal journalist and choke the living shi* out of him - literally!I hear ya. Me, too!
I was speaking of deterring the jihadis.
Yeah, that's me. Must be a product of 8 years in the USMC.
I did. Lots of "blah blah blah" but no real meat to back it up.
I guess you've earned the right to turn your back on this poor trooper. Thank God other Marines haven't.
Contrary to what you believe, I haven't turned my back on him. I merely note that life in the Marines prepares you for adversity.
I've had people "unfairly" say nasty things about me when I was a Marine. I didn't give a flying fornication what they thought, I just continued mission.
Three and a half years is all it takes.
In other words... the ICC is the global "organization" which, when studied closely, resembles the so-called "black reparations" scam.
It's extortion, hidden by legalese, and socialist theatrical make-up.
Ar$eholes. Blow them all up! Just G-r-r-r-r!
True. We have a reputation for being soft and weak, which is why so many people flock into Iraq from other countries to fight us. (Ironically, few of them return home alive). This video may put some scare in them. Not much consolation to the Marine facing charges, though.
Second. The whole media circus surrounding Abu Ghraib -- has changed the way the public views the news. Now they are far more skeptical than before Abu Ghraib, and Kerry's "stars from 4 months in Vietnam".
True, but again, irrelevant to the Marine.
Third, the military does THOROUGH investigations which are not carved around "ratings" and income (like in the private sector) -- therefore, the real details and data will emerge...
I have two concerns here.
First, as I stated earlier, is that I fear the facts of the matter will show the Marine violated the rules of engagement, and will face prosecution. 'I felt threatened' are the three golden words for meeting 'use of lethal force' requirements, but you need to be able to show cause. Being spooked because an unarmed, wounded terrorist may be playing dead (i.e. no hostile act) won't cut it, as far as the ROE goes.
Second, when in doubt, the military often chooses to punish anyway, especially when bad publicity is involved. Are they going to fall on the sword of public opinion for one Marine caught in a very messy and questionable PR nightmare, when they could just wash their hands and move on?
bump for later read
I musta had a brain-gasser. Pardon.
"Kevin Sites is famous now. Maybe now he should go back to New York, write his book, and get the fark out of the way from now on."
The stupid bastard should have kept his film and MOUTH shut.
Those unwilling or unable to do what the enemy is able and willing to do, will not win.
And the tragedy is compounded by the Old Media. The Old Media have lost their two biggest audience draws: the election and the Scott Peterson case. (Choosing Senate leadership isn't quite in the same category). What they want is a big scandal as an audience draw. This Marine is being lynched to keep up their ratings.
Great job on your profile page. Excellent comments about the Marine.
"... but you need to be able to show cause. "
From all that I've been reading on boards, from MSM, and from other soldiers.. I think the Marine will in fact be able to prove this "I felt threatened". I know this often boils down to "was proper warning given" (before shooting a moving "alleged" injured".)
"Second, when in doubt, the military often chooses to punish anyway, especially when bad publicity is involved. Are they going to fall on the sword of public opinion for one Marine caught in a very messy and questionable PR nightmare, when they could just wash their hands and move on?"
Yes, the military is a very strict discipline. I've been inside, with some soldiers, some total Catch-22 situations, and I've seen how strict it is. My own hunch is, the public has made clear it stands with the soldiers (given last election results) and Safeguarding the US. Plus, and lastly, Joe-Public has also made it clear he wants the US Military mission to be completed (this part), and... this mission involves ridding Iraq of some *REALLY* BAD guys. The longer the bad guys stay and keep on being "bad", the longer our toops have to fight -- greater chances of losing more troops.
Ergo, I think public opinion, overall (certainly in anon mode) holds with the Marine's actions. Not the injured (now dead) lying, cheating, murdering thug.
Thank you for the Ping. WOW!
Ignore Poobah, he's going around all the threads trying to defend Sites,despite the fact that as more is known about him it is evident that he is a biased anti war protester.
Make that 6247 sigs.Thanks for the link
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.