To: 68skylark
...and to think that once I defended Muslims when I heard them called stone-age fanatics...I don't do that anymore.
10 posted on
11/17/2004 3:17:38 PM PST by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
Try the term "islamderthal" on for size, it's my favorite.
20 posted on
11/17/2004 3:18:42 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
To: EagleUSA
...and to think that once I defended Muslims when I heard them called stone-age fanatics...I don't do that anymore. Yeah, I also used to defend them against blanket criticism. I don't do that anymore, either.
To: EagleUSA
"...and to think that once I defended Muslims when I heard them called stone-age fanatics...I don't do that anymore"
Cavemen were far advanced in comparison.
When you look at the region of the first civilization to crumble from loss of moral values, you see a population that has the most experience at being immoral.
I seem to remember that France has a lot of experience in that field. After all,, they did introduce the Indian art of scalping their opponents; before killing them.
38 posted on
11/17/2004 3:22:58 PM PST by
Dalite
(If PRO is the opposite of CON, What is the opposite of PROgress? Go Figure....)
To: EagleUSA
"...and to think that once I defended Muslims when I heard them called stone-age fanatics...I don't do that anymore."
You have my empathy. I once knew so little about Islam that I was calling it "Mohammedism" late into the 1980s. Ignorance was bliss.
115 posted on
11/17/2004 5:12:13 PM PST by
jocon307
(Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson