To: Mat_Helm; Max Combined
Scheuer is not credible. I heard him interviewed for about 45 minutes on NPR this past summer.
It was the most interesting interview on the topic I have heard.
I am not saying we should follow his advice.
But what he has to say should be discussed in detail--not just dimissed out of hand.
Revolutionary ideas may be what's needed to defend us from the dangers of modern terrorism.
To: Age of Reason
In this thread there are transcripts of two interviews of Scheuer. There is nothing interesting, original, or revolutionary about anything he says in either one.
What are Scheuer's revolutionary ideas that may be the key to defending ourselves from modern terrorism as you see them?
153 posted on
11/17/2004 4:27:22 PM PST by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
To: Age of Reason
"Revolutionary ideas may be what's needed to defend us from the dangers of modern terrorism."
He does not want to defend us, he want us to make a bargain with the devil. He is a weakling, a coward, and an appeaser.
155 posted on
11/17/2004 4:30:07 PM PST by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
To: Age of Reason
"I heard him interviewed for about 45 minutes on NPR this past summer."
I stopped listening to NPR years ago, since they are so partisan and biased. Their All Things Considered should be called All Things Considered From a Leftist Viewpoint.
156 posted on
11/17/2004 4:34:39 PM PST by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
To: Age of Reason
"I heard him interviewed for about 45 minutes on NPR this past summer."
I stopped listening to NPR years ago, since they are so partisan and biased. Their All Things Considered should be called All Things Considered From a Leftist Viewpoint.
157 posted on
11/17/2004 4:34:40 PM PST by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
To: Age of Reason
"REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS"? Such as being worse than modern day Quislings and Chamberlains?
The world ignore Hitler's early wee adventure,assuming incorrectly,that he'd stop after gobbling up a few countries,that most other nations didn't give a damn about. So now,NOW, we should have given in to OBL and allow the destruction of Israel,his take over of ALL Muslim nations,imagining,INCORRECTLY,that his complete intent and purposes aren't really TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD,making it one Islamonazi caliphate?
You really don't understand any of this!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson