Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCRAMJET TEST: NASA plane makes history with Mach 9.6 flight
Manchester Union Leader ^ | November 17, 2004 | Jim Antczak/AP

Posted on 11/17/2004 3:06:21 AM PST by billorites

LOS ANGELES - A tiny unmanned NASA "scramjet" soared above the Pacific Ocean Tuesday at nearly 10 times the speed of sound, or almost 7,000 mph, in a record-breaking demonstration of a radical new engine technology.

The 12-foot-long X-43A supersonic combustion ramjet flew at about Mach 9.6 or slightly higher, said research engineer Randy Voland, leader of the scramjet propulsion team at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base.

The exotic aircraft flew under its own power for about 10 seconds after separating from a booster rocket at 111,000 feet, then glided to a splash landing about 800 miles offshore. Analysis of data to determine the exact performance will take several months, but mission officials were jubilant.

"Once again we made aviation history. We did that in March when we went seven times the speed of sound and now we've done it right around 10 times the speed of sound," said Vince Rausch, Hyper-X program manager from NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia.

The X-43A, mounted on a Pegasus rocket used to boost it to flight speed, was carried under the wing of a B-52 aircraft and released at an altitude of 40,000 feet over a test range off the Southern California coast. The rocket motor then fired for a 90-second ascent.

"It's 90 seconds of terror, but once it's over with you realize that you've really accomplished some great things," said Joel Sitz, the X-43A project manager at Dryden.

Like its predecessors, the X-43A will not be recovered from the ocean.

The flight was the last in a $230 million-plus effort to test technology most likely to be initially used in military aircraft, such as a bomber that could reach any target on Earth within two hours of takeoff from the United States, or to power missiles.

Scramjets may also provide an alternative to rockets for space launches.

Unlike conventional jet engines which use rotating fan blades to compress air for combustion, the X-43A has no such rotating engine parts. Instead it uses the underside of the aircraft's forebody to "scoop" up and compress air for mixing with hydrogen fuel.

The X-43A launched Tuesday was the last of three built for NASA's Hyper-X program.

The first X-43A flight failed in 2001 when the booster rocket veered off course and was destroyed.

The second X-43A successfully flew in March, reaching Mach 6.83 - nearly 5,000 mph - and setting a world speed record for a plane powered by an air-breathing engine.

That was more than double the top speed of the jet-powered SR-71 Blackbird spyplane, which at slightly more than Mach 3 is the fastest air-breathing, manned aircraft.

The old X-15 was the fastest rocket-powered manned airplane, hitting Mach 6.7. Rockets don't "breathe" air, but instead carry oxidizers that are combined with fuel to allow combustion.

Not having to carry oxygen is one of the advantages scramjets hold over rockets. Rockets can also reach high speeds but the weight of oxygen tanks or other oxidizers reduces the amount of payload they can carry.

Tuesday's launch was expected to be the last research flight for NASA's B-52, which is being retired after some 40 years of service.

___

On the Net:

Dryden Flight Research Center: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov

Langley Research Center: http://www.larc.nasa.gov


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/17/2004 3:06:21 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites

Shoot, this is nothing. Scotty can get the Enterprise to Mach 9.96 without giving it a second thought.



When NASA can do Warp 5, now THAT'S something to brag about!!


2 posted on 11/17/2004 3:31:15 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Slideshow Here.
3 posted on 11/17/2004 3:37:40 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I guess that's fast, but then again NASA has never see my daughter drive to the mall...now THAT'S fast.


4 posted on 11/17/2004 3:46:15 AM PST by sierrahome (Proud member of the Geo. W. Bush Reelection Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
When the USAF and NASA pulled the plug on the National Aerospace Plane in 1995, we had serious concerns about the scram. We HAD the fuel (H2); we HAD the ultra-advanced materials (carbon-carbon and other classified materials); we HAD the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to computer test this stuff---but the scram just was not developing "thrust over drag."

This is moving much faster than NASA, for one, thought, and I wouldn't be just a little surprised if the PRIVATE Ruttan-based group didn't add a little "incentive" for the government scientists to solve a few problems.

5 posted on 11/17/2004 4:06:51 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

These things have been test flown over Georgia for years. The Atlanta Journal had a story about it back in the mid-90s including a sketch made by a reporter who happened to see the thing and didn't have a camera.


6 posted on 11/17/2004 4:32:19 AM PST by KateatRFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KateatRFM
The AJC is as bad as Dan Rather about making things up.

BTW, this should make a really cool cruise missile. With a few of these, Clinton might have actually gotten OBL instead of empty tents in his Monicagate cruise strike.

7 posted on 11/17/2004 5:06:19 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
Shoot, this is nothing. Scotty can get the Enterprise to Mach 9.96 without giving it a second thought.

According to this warp chart, Mach 9.96 doesn't even register.


8 posted on 11/17/2004 5:57:23 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson