[raybbr]

I wanted to villify this guy too, at first. I looked objectively at his site. I can find no commentary just reporting. Don't you think that if he was as anti-war as you and other claim his site would be frought with anti-war commentary?

I have looked through the site and have seen some pretty complimentary stuff about our soldiers. I just don't see the anti-war bias you see.

As for the pix on the imagages against the war site, I still say he may have sent other photos but the ones posted were chosen by the site.

[huac]

First, if my very life depended on the Marines, if they were the sole protection I possessed while roaming around a combat zone unarmed, I would not hazard to insult them with my anti-war beliefs (Marines I know don't tend to be sympathetic to Leftist anti-war mewlings, especially if they are the subject of such mewlings). So I would say nice things about them.
Second, if I was an outsider trying to gain the enemies trust, I would not say bad things about them. I would say good things about them. I would ingratiate myself. I would act like their best friend until that moment I got what I wanted (in Sites case, the story of his journalistic life- his career is assured in the MSM with this one). Spies go out of their way to say the right things to insure that they are not discovered before their mission is complete.