Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: speedy

It works for me. In another post I described the stew outfits from the 60s and the manniquens and outfits alone were damn impressive - statuesque, buxom, hourglass type figures, etc. The best word, for an admirer of the female form like me, is 'impressive.'

Actually I have nothing categorically against those kind of hiring practices. What's the big deal? I like the idea of flying with goodlooking, buxom, sexually appealing and sexually available women.

I came along a little too late...


60 posted on 11/16/2004 4:22:50 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanNY

I don't consider any of those attributes to be sins, either. And the women who held those jobs did not have guns at their heads when they took them. But just because customers liked it, and employees liked it -- why, Heaven forbid, we could not allow such a dreadful state of affairs to go unchecked.


64 posted on 11/16/2004 4:55:45 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson