Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah

Actually, it's both. If, say, the USAirways contracts are voided, the flight attendants for that airline would be striking when the contract had been voided.

Your point is also well taken, the flight attendants for all other airlines would be striking while under a valid contract. This would be the equivalent of what the PATCO Air Traffic Controllers did under my Freeper namesake, President Reagan. Striking under that set of facts is a well-established replacement worker situation.

Reagan80


40 posted on 11/16/2004 3:00:40 PM PST by Reagan80 ("Government is not the solution to our problems, Government IS the problem." -RR; 1980 Inaugural)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan80

PATCO were federal employees statutorily prohibited from striking; it didn't involve a contractual situation. PATCO strikers weren't "replaced" - they were discharged.


50 posted on 11/16/2004 3:20:47 PM PST by hadrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson