Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26

I disagree with you. Further I question if you have ever been is such a situation. This soldier was in the fray, not you, the reporter was biased, and has a history of bias. Example after example of enemy tactics have been drilled into these guys, the warfare books we have gotten our hands on for the taliban, the Al Zawquari groups and the Al Sadr groups clearly define this as a tactic. To question a soldier while on assignment or patrol is shortsighted unless you have first hand experience, or you were there in the group. Shame on you.


939 posted on 11/17/2004 1:32:42 PM PST by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: etraveler13
>To question a soldier while on assignment or patrol is shortsighted unless you have first hand experience, or you were there in the group. Shame on you.


Actually.... no. Had you read, rather than reacted, you would have seen that I simply called for fully understanding the results of the Art 31 investigation, rather than shooting all our ammo now, before we know the details.

Have I been in that operational situation? yeah, a time or two.............
944 posted on 11/17/2004 2:52:23 PM PST by MindBender26 (Al Queda, Taliban, Dan Rather, Jessie Jackson, Osama Bin Laden: Same slime, different uniforms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson