To: BookaT
I also wonder if our guys are in a little bit more danger because of the pantywetter. If you're in war and trying to protect a pantywetter you put yourself in harms way.
54 posted on
11/16/2004 4:56:04 AM PST by
tutstar
( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Violations of Florida Statutes ongoing!)
To: tutstar
My thoughts exactly only...the troops may not be able to stop embeds from tagging along, but how mindful they are of their safety is another consideration altogether.
Of course the US Military will do the right thing and protect this scum if danger threatens, but every now and then I like to think along other lines in flights of fancy.
77 posted on
11/16/2004 5:04:41 AM PST by
borisbob69
(Old shade is better than new shade!)
To: tutstar
You're right; our troops are more in danger because of the embedded reporters. Because they're standing by ready to sabotage the military, our troops are intimidated and cannot do their job. W should pull the embeds ASAP.
To: tutstar
"I also wonder if our guys are in a little bit more danger because of the pantywetter. If you're in war and trying to protect a pantywetter you put yourself in harms way."
Here's a question for the forum: Has an embedded reporter ever been fragged by the troops he is covering? If not, why not?
785 posted on
11/16/2004 6:57:03 PM PST by
yooper
(If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson