true. but I wonder if, as in many cases, this fradulent plantiffs doesn't have anything to sue for.
actually, this thread brings up a good concept - some kind of FR legal defense fund. not directly staffed, but maybe a cooperative effort with some of the existing conservative legal defense organizations out there, with contributions raised as part of the normal (perhaps expanded) FR freepathons. not sure of the implications of something like that for FR.
MI Ping list!!!
Probably doesn't have two nickels to rub together; which, is the best defense for this kind of thing I'd think.
After all, can't get blood outa a turnip, can ya?
I'd think given what Bannon's told us about his [financial] situation he'd be in a splendid position to suck this sucker's defense funds *dry* on their way to a net zero *payday*.
But what do I know.
"actually, this thread brings up a good concept - some kind of FR legal defense fund. not directly staffed, but maybe a cooperative effort with some of the existing conservative legal defense organizations out there, with contributions raised as part of the normal (perhaps expanded) FR freepathons. not sure of the implications of something like that for FR."
I can't speak for the Old Man, but if I had to guess I'd say he'd want nothing to do with this *or* sheisters after his last experience.
Weren't around when what I'm talking about happened, you say?
Ping 'em & ask him about one Brian Buckley.
That's all it'd take.
...& if ya smell ozone, *duck*. :o)