Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. conducts successful test of anti-ballistic missile laser
World Tribune ^ | 11/15/04 | World Tribune

Posted on 11/15/2004 12:18:57 PM PST by rawhide

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM Monday, November 15, 2004 The United States has reported a successful ground-based test of an airborne laser meant to intercept ballistic missiles.

The Missile Defense Agency said the megawatt-class laser underwent a successful test on Nov. 10. The Pentagon agency said the laser was operated in a ground-based demonstration at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.

Officials said this marked the first time that a directed energy weapon meant for use in a Boeing 747 aircraft has been demonstrated.

The test, which lasted a fraction of a second, involved the simultaneous firing of all six laser modules and associated optics that comprise the Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser. Officials said the modules,built by Northrop Grumman, performed as expected.

Officials said the test was conducted in the framework of the Airborne Laser project. "It was the first time that multiple modules of the powerful laser had ever been fired while linked together as a single unit," the Missile Defense Agency said in a statement on Nov. 10. "In the test, the laser light produced by the six modules was fired into a wall of metal called a calorimeter or beam dump. The temperature rise of the metal was used to validate that laser power was generated."

The ABL program has undergone a two-year delay in wake of the failure to develop a laser weapon that could be fitted into the nose of a Boeing 747-400F aircraft. The Pentagon has acknowledged that the laser system developed in 2002 was too heavy for flight.

The ABL, a program expected to reach $4 billion through 2008, has been designed to autonomously detect, track and destroy enemy ballistic missiles.

The high-power laser was meant to focus a basketball-sized spot of heat that can destroy a missile in the boost-phase of launch at a range of hundreds of kilometers.

Officials said the ABL was meant to intercept ballistic missiles from such countries as Iran and North Korea. Israel has expressed interest in the ABL and was said to be seeking to cooperate with the United States in a scaled-down version of the program.

The Nov. 10 test was said to have verified the integration, operation and control of six laser modules in flight configuration. Officials said the laser would be installed in the 747, integrated with the beam control/fire control system and eventually tested in flight.

Officials said the ABL prototype, termed YAL-1A, has resumed preparations for its first flight test. In December 2002, the aircraft was removed from service for modifications to the airframe to ensure the installation of the laser beam control system.

In early 2005, officials said, the ABL Track Illuminator Laser and Beacon Illuminator Laser would be installed. This would be followed by a flight of the YAL-1A that would include the test of the full beam control system.

At a later stage, the Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser would be installed on the Boeing 747, followed by additional ground and flight tests. Officials said no date has been set for the first ABL attempt to intercept a ballistic missile.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: antiballistic; laser; missiledefense; missle; test
Interesting!
1 posted on 11/15/2004 12:18:58 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rawhide

"Wheres the frickin lasers!"- Doctor Evil


2 posted on 11/15/2004 12:22:59 PM PST by rightgrafix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

3 posted on 11/15/2004 12:24:48 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

GOOD!!!!


4 posted on 11/15/2004 12:26:41 PM PST by anonymoussierra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightgrafix

Hah! The "Allen-Parsons Project" lives!!


5 posted on 11/15/2004 12:27:14 PM PST by Charles Martel ("Diplomats. The best diplomat I know of is a fully loaded phaser bank" - Cdr. Montgomery Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
The high-power laser was meant to focus a basketball-sized spot of heat

Basketball sized? That sounds Perfect for ZOTTING the 42 fireant mounds here on the property.

Pass this on to Dale Gribble please.

6 posted on 11/15/2004 12:30:56 PM PST by uncleshag (Send the light !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
please find a way to place these in space and make them able to target individual people like Saddam , bin Laden
and Kim jong ill from space.....
call it Global Opponent Destroyer
7 posted on 11/15/2004 12:32:36 PM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Hmmmm. Can someone verify something for me.
I occasionally read Lev Nasorov over at Newsmax.com.
He seems to think that China is developing a
nano-tech-based weapon system that will obsolete
nuclear warheads. I think he is referring to
ICBMs/MIRVs, etc, trackable on radar. He is usually
very vague and my eamils to him have gone unaswered.

Is he referring to a space platform-based system such as
we might see w/ the aforementioned laser? Also,
might it be in a similar vein to the particle beam
systems tested in the 70s by the USSR but found to be
lacking?

My point here is that any countermeasure that
could neutralize nuclear throwweight, whether
light-based, matter-based or other, would serve
to obsolete long-range nukes. OTOH, unless one
had absolute visibility anywhere and everywhere,
short-range and radar-transparent carriers might
escape and remain effective.

I'd appreciate any headsup.

MV


8 posted on 11/15/2004 12:33:44 PM PST by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Already posted.


9 posted on 11/15/2004 12:45:34 PM PST by Norman Bates (Game over. Bush wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

bttt


10 posted on 11/15/2004 1:24:09 PM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

I hadn't seen it then....I see this report....


11 posted on 11/15/2004 2:14:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madvlad

The only nanotech weapon I know of is the "gray sludge". It is composed of nanites that replicate themselves using the material around them. Unchecked, they could destroy a city in short order, and the only defense against these little buggers IS a nuke, or an EMP generator.
This is all just science fiction right now, though. I wouldn't worry too much about it...


12 posted on 11/15/2004 3:52:19 PM PST by America_Right (Congratulations President Bush! Looking forward to 4 more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

So glad our President is interested in protecting our families and children with systems like this...unlike that commie RATS who vote against EVERY one of them.


13 posted on 11/15/2004 4:47:29 PM PST by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Will it take out Euro satellites?
14 posted on 11/15/2004 4:48:26 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: rawhide

Too heavy for a 747. That is some major league generator. Must be a city sized powerplant. Even C bs HQ and sats must be within range.


16 posted on 11/15/2004 11:13:44 PM PST by petertare (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: America_Right

So, we had to nuke the city in order
to save it! bwahahahahahahahahaaha

Or else its a high-altitude burst
in order to maximize EMP coverage.

MV


17 posted on 11/16/2004 6:52:49 AM PST by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson