Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nosofar
For the most part the history of slavery in the North occurred in a different country in a different time among different people.

Slavery in the South, on the other hand, occurred in this country within it's own history and among our own people.

2 posted on 11/15/2004 12:08:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah; nosofar
For the most part the history of slavery in the North occurred in a different country in a different time among different people.

Slavery in the South, on the other hand, occurred in this country within it's own history and among our own people.

But the slaves in the South didn't get there by swimming across the Atlantic Ocean. The people who settled the South were not known for their seamanship either. For the most part, it was Yankee sea captains and crews who transported Africans across the Atlantic. In 1808 Congress abolished the African slave trade. So what did the Yankee ship owners and captains do? They started shipping opium to China. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's grandfather made his fortune shipping opium to China to buy Chinese goods to ship back to the US.

8 posted on 11/15/2004 12:24:24 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Arlen Specter's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
Is English your first language?
That is an incomprehensible post.
54 posted on 11/16/2004 2:25:29 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
For the most part the history of slavery in the North occurred in a different country in a different time among different people. Slavery in the South, on the other hand, occurred in this country within it's own history and among our own people.

How do you figure that?

63 posted on 11/16/2004 2:49:59 PM PST by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
For the most part the history of slavery in the North occurred in a different country in a different time among different people. Slavery in the South, on the other hand, occurred in this country within it's own history and among our own people.

Garbage. Barely 80 years separated the start of abolition in New England and the final abolition in the south and yet you claim they were "different people"? Also contrary to your claims, many northern states did have slavery well into the 19th century. New Jersey did not enact manumission until only 20 years before the war and still had a small number of grandfathered slaveowners at the time it broke out. Delaware still had slaves through the war itself and Illinois had a race-based indentured servitude system that was slavery by any other name. Yankeeland was as guilty as anybody else

80 posted on 11/17/2004 5:09:59 PM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
Slaves were kept in Illinois until at least 1846.

One such place was the Old Slave House in Equality, IL.

I visited it on a school field trip back in the 1970's.

93 posted on 11/18/2004 3:00:53 PM PST by Knitebane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson