Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist

Your statement, if true, has nothing to do with my comment at any rate. Given the decline in trade to the South as the War was ramping up I would expect a decline in traffic.
Your contention that the North did not have a significant export trade also supports my statement that the tariffs had the same negative impact on the farmers of North and South.

I think you need to have your eyes examined. I said H's Report was NOT accepted. Since bounties were the main reason he wrote it their rejection meant it was rejected as well.


145 posted on 11/19/2004 8:57:45 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
I said H's Report was NOT accepted.

And I said you are simply wrong about that. The bounties were rejected but the tariffs were not. Nor were the tariffs an inconsequential matter - they take up more pages in the report than any other item.

150 posted on 11/19/2004 9:35:52 PM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson