Posted on 11/15/2004 9:56:07 AM PST by Cableguy
William Safire will publish his final column as a New York Times Op-Ed columnist on January 24, 2005.
Arthur Sulzberger Jr, publisher of The New York Times, said, "The New York Times without Bill Safire is all but unimaginable. Bill's provocative and insightful commentary has held our readers captive since he first graced our Op-Ed Page in 1973. Reaching for his column became a critical and enjoyable part of the day for our readers across the country and around the world. Whether you agreed with him or not was never the point. His writing is delightful, informed and engaging. So, too, is the man, who in addition to being a world-class columnist has been a world-class friend and colleague to a generation of Times men and women."
Mr. Safire, 74, will continue to write his Sunday column, "On Language," which has appeared in The New York Times Magazine since 1979 and has led to the publication of 15 books, making him one of the most widely read writers on the English language. He is also the author of 10 other works of fiction and nonfiction and editor of five anthologies. No successor to Mr. Safire as an Op-Ed columnist has been chosen at this time.
"After more than three decades of opinionated reporting on the world's first and foremost political battle page, it's time to hang up my hatchet," said Mr. Safire. "The Times said at the start of this run that it wanted 'another point of view,' which was what it surely got, and its editors did not wince nor cry aloud. In my more scholarly persona, I couldn't resist continuing as Sunday language maven, so although Mr. Hyde will close up shop, Dr. Jekyll will carry on."
In 1978, Mr. Safire was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for distinguished commentary. Before joining The Times in 1973 as a political columnist, Mr. Safire was a senior White House speechwriter for President Nixon. He had previously been a radio and television producer and a U.S. Army correspondent. He began his career in 1949 as a reporter for a profiles column in The New York Herald Tribune.
From 1955 to 1960, Mr. Safire was vice president of a public relations firm in New York City and then became president of his own firm. He was responsible for bringing Mr. Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev together in the 1959 Moscow "kitchen debate" to publicize his homebuilding client's kitchen. In 1968, he left to join the campaign of Richard Nixon.
Mr. Safire attended Syracuse University, dropped out after two years, returned twice later to deliver commencement addresses, and is now a trustee. He served as a member of the Pulitzer Board from 1995 to 2004. Since 1993, he has been active with the Dana Foundation, a philanthropy supporting brain science, immunology, and arts education. He is currently its chairman and will make this his principal occupation.
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT), a leading media company with 2003 revenues of $3.2 billion, includes The New York Times, the International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe, 16 other newspapers, eight network-affiliated television stations, two New York City radio stations and more than 40 Web sites, including NYTimes.com and Boston.com. For the fourth consecutive year, the Company was ranked No. 1 in the publishing industry in Fortune's 2004 list of America's Most Admired Companies. The Company's core purpose is to enhance society by creating, collecting and distributing high-quality news, information and entertainment.
I believe Hugh Hewitt is superbly qualified for that position.
I think we have a chance...
They'll probably pick a top flight, generally recognized, forceful conservative, you know, like David Gergen.
safire was the last reason for me to subscribe to the ny kapo times . now i can cancel.
safire was the last reason for me to subscribe to the ny kapo times . now i can cancel.
"what the Times could really use is a Mark Steyn."
Yes, he would be a good fit.
But who would be more likely to rattle some cages at Times Square? My money's on Ann.
(Diabolically tents fingers.)
Ex-sss-helll-ent!
(Silently masturbates to the thought of vacant NYT op-ed slot. Adjusts bow tie.)
They shall now replace him with a serious left-wing nutbag and refer to him as a "moderate".
To be honest, I don't really take issue with his political beliefs-with the possible exception of his genuflection before the omniscient senator from AZ, John McCain-as much as I do his incredibly grating personality.
While he can be amusing at times-in fact, his book: "Politicians, Partisans and Parasites...", was probably one of the more entertaining autobiographies/memoirs written by a cable chat show puppet-more often than not, he's just plain irritating.
He seems to be working under the misconception that simply because he can make a witty quip here and there, it entitles him to assume an air of someone who's a member of the political/cultural aristocracy.
Trust me, Tucker Carlson believes-even though he'll never admit this publicly-that he's on the same plain as a P.J. O'Rourke or Tom Wolfe. When the harsh truth is, he doesn't even begin to approach the level of an R. Emmett Tyrell or an Andrew Ferguson.
That being said, I thought that the way he dissed and dismissed that smirking chimp-Jon Stewart-was awesome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.