You'd help your case more if you didn't post garbage from Wallbuilders. They are error prone pseudo-historians and normally end up making our case look bad. There's substantially better, higher quality stuff out there that can withstand academic scrutiny unlike the tripe put out by David Barton and co. See http://www.libertyfund.org
Could you please explain your disdain for Dan Barton and WallBuilders, perhaps with some examples, and we'll go from there.