If anyone bothers to read Yossef Bodansky's book, "Bin Laden", which was published in 1999 -- BEFORE the Sept 11 attacks -- they would realize that Iran is the MAIN ENEMY behind all this Islamist terrorism. And it is quite clear from that book that only thru regime change in Tehran can we change (temporarily win) the medium term situation. Bin Laden, Iraq, Sudan, PLO, Pakistan and Syria are subordinate intermediaries in the Islamist campaign. Complete victory will require the West to CONQUER the countries from India to the Mediterranean to the Atlantic (north Africa). But even here this is only the medium term solution (30 - 60 years) because the Iranian regime is a communist controlled front. Anatoliy Golitsyn's book, "The Perestroika Deception," explains the change in communist strategy from frontal assault to a flanking assault under cover of Islamist nationalism.
I thought Bush understood this and that the invasion of Iraq was just the first step in the right direction. But now it is clear to me that the Bushies didn't and don't understand the TRUE strategic threat -- the new distributed-network structure of the COMINTERN successor communist party (read Wallace H. Spaulding's book, "Is the COMINTERN Coming Back?").
Does this mean administration and the E3 are in cahoots with mullahs?