Posted on 11/14/2004 10:33:17 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
For decades, kids have enjoyed following the out-of-this-world exploits of comic-book heroes, learning along the way about courage and heroism, and the need for the forces of good to triumph over the nefarious plots of those possessed by evil. Every generation needs to learn their own duty to sacrifice and fight for the good.
But lately, ever since the first "Spiderman" live-action movie roared at the box office, fans of the long-lasting Marvel Comics stable of superheroes have been inundated with big, noisy, expensive blockbusters bringing these two-dimensional pen-and-ink heroes to life. Unfortunately, in attempting to dramatize Marvel honcho Stan Lee's formula -- paper heroes deepened on the page by troubled private lives in their worlds of secret identity -- these films have all suffered in varying degrees, growing ever more dark and gloomy, almost hopeless.
While the "Spiderman" films have retained a fraction of whimsy, movies like "Daredevil" and "The Incredible Hulk" have left many fans hoping they'd seen more righteous heroism and less sulky realism. In the final analysis, superhero comics work best when the reader is inspired, not left seeking Dr. Phil. Complex superheroes can make for a nice, dramatic storyline, but when they're so tortured by personal demons, they can't be very super, can they?
For those who do like their heroes a little less super-serious than the superhuman characters of old, there is a surprisingly mature option: Pixar's new cartoon "The Incredibles." This film unfolds like a comic book, with lots of action, but in between its animated lines, it offers real lessons about heroism, the use of talents and commitment to family. It's not often that a cartoon carries a line where a child worries, "Mom and Dad's life could be in jeopardy ... or even worse ... their marriage!"
Believe the critics on this one: It is a terrific film for the whole family. As with all the other Pixar movies, this film is not only brilliantly animated, but rich in character and plot. And yet the surprising thing about the new picture is how adult it seems. Instead of the parents struggling to find fragments of adult enjoyment -- often found in snarky asides -- it's more likely the grade-school children will fidget in spots that become so real you have to remember you're watching a cartoon.
The plot of "The Incredibles" starts with some surprising social criticism. After saving a man trying to commit suicide, the film's lead superhero, Mr. Incredible, is sued by the man, who didn't want to be saved. That suit is followed by a tangle of torts that causes the entire cavalcade of caped crime-fighters to enter a secret federal Superhero Relocation Program.
Demoted to the prototypical unspectacular job of insurance agent, Mr. Incredible (now known as "Bob Parr") gripes that "They keep inventing new ways to celebrate mediocrity." He's hiding away with his wife Helen (formerly the stretchy heroine Elastigirl). His son Dash, blessed with super speed, is banned from competing in school sports, lest he betray the family secret. "Dad says our powers make us special," he protests. "Everyone is special, Dash," his mother replies. "Which is another way of saying no one is," Dash complains.
If that sounds like some Ayn Rand capitalist fable of the mediocre punishing the talented, there is always the offsetting fun the filmmakers have with Bob's insurance work. While Bob's oily supervisor wants every insurance claim rejected for the health of the company bottom line, heroic Bob can't help but whisper to his customers every tactic to circumvent company bureaucracy to ease their pain and suffering. This ends badly, with Bob losing his temper and tossing the boss through several walls, something even superheroes succumb to when their patience is taxed.
Bob loses his job, of course, and to make up for the lost income, he is recruited into secret superhero work with a slinky mystery woman named Mirage. (That's where the worries about the Parr marriage creep in.) What happens next draws the entire Incredible family -- father, mother, the son Dash, and the invisibility-powered teenage daughter Violet -- into a titanic superhero struggle with a super-villain, replete with a morality play of good versus evil.
Too often, we know what to expect from Hollywood, and we get it, in all its sensation-seeking, nihilistic glory. But it's a nice departure when someone in the entertainment world can dazzle us with a movie that everyone in the family can savor and enjoy. In fact, it's incredible.
I agree with your take of spiderman 2 and I hope for once it breaks the ridgid formal rule that a hero can't have a girl-friend.
By the way, I thought XMen 2 was also superior in droves to X 1, especially at the end when the telepath sacrifices her-self to save her friends....the glowing birdlike image in the lake in the closing scenes was a forshadowing I'm told for the rise of the PHoenix!
My brother and sil have talked to friends who said the same thing.
I think parents who let their kids watch a lot of television have become desensitized. My brother's kids probably don't want more than 2 hours of television a week. Without prejudice :-) I can tell you that my two nieces are the most fun, sweet and smart kids I've ever met. Being involved in other activities besides television is the big difference, as far as I can tell.
i didn't like how they all died in the end...
teeman
and anthony perkins is his own mother
I saw it yesterday with my son, and I want to see it again. When they ran with the theme of superheroes hobbled by lawsuits and mediocrity, I couldn't believe I was watching a Hollywood movie. A movie Ronald Reagan would have loved.
I saw it with my two girls yesterday. It's on the buy-as-soon-as-it's-released DVD list. Great movie.
From the MPAA itself concerning the PG rating:
PG:"Parental Guidance Suggested. Some Material May Not Be Suitable For Children."This is a film which clearly needs to be examined or inquired into by parents before they let their children attend. The label PG plainly states that parents may consider some material unsuitable for their children, but the parent must make the decision.
Parents are warned against sending their children, unseen and without inquiry, to PG-rated movies.
The theme of a PG-rated film may itself call for parental guidance. There may be some profanity in these films. There may be some violence or brief nudity. But these elements are not deemed so intense as to require that parents be strongly cautioned beyond the suggestion of parental guidance. There is no drug use content in a PG-rated film.
The PG rating, suggesting parental guidance, is thus an alert for examination of a film by parents before deciding on its viewing by their children.
Obviously such a line is difficult to draw. In our pluralistic society it is not easy to make judgments without incurring some disagreement. So long as parents know they must exercise parental responsibility, the rating serves as a meaningful guide and as a warning.
We were very careful what our kids watched when they were young.
I noticed that my young son reacted negatively to Scooby-Doo...a kid's cartoon....
..he would hide his eyes, and leave the room, and sometimes have nightmares...
..so, no Scooby-Doo for him.
That might sound silly....but the show frightened him.
It's something modern-day Disney could not have done: it was funny, wholesome, and promoted the values of family and conservatism. There were no "hopefully-over-the-kids-heads" remarks to "keep the adults interest" that keep getting stuck into these movies. At least none that I spotted. The wife loved and admired her husband, and he loved her, showing no interest in the slinky lady, etc, etc
For a post September 11 action-adventure cartoon, I thought this was *highly* appropriate. There were no network or studio censors clipping out scenes of falling buildings and people that day. Kids know that what this character says in this movie is absolutely *true.*
Scooby Doo frightens me.
Note that these are not Disney films, they are Pixar films. Disney does the marketing, promotion, distribution, etc. but they are not involved in the writing, directing or creation. I think the agreement between the companies either ends with this film or the next one.
[Note: I'm going to be the Doubting Thomas again. The short for the next movie about CARS looks silly. I said the same thing about Finding Nemo and had to eat my words. Here's hoping I'm wrong again!]
Does the baby arrive at the end?
How will this register for my 6 and 9 year olds? I'm looking forward to taking them to see the movie.
Well, yeah. It's not G rated. It's PG. You'd be irresponsible to bring a small child to this movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.