Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: risk

As Robert Bork points out, the SJC ruling regarding the flag overturned precedent back to the founding fathers. Nobody prior to Griswald would have contended that flag burning was constitutionally protected, no more than sodomy.


27 posted on 11/14/2004 5:34:22 AM PST by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Meldrim
Isn't Bork citing the defense of our flag on government outposts? Of course flags that are public and private property should be fully protected.

This issue should worry all Americans. Are we drifting toward a point where dissent is prohibited by law?

I am not going along with the statists on this issue. A lot of other Americans are quite wary of the implications of this zeal, as well. If you don't mind raising the hackles of a large number of freedom-loving Americans, then by all means continue to try to use the Constitution as a vehicle for the suppression of liberty.

That would set a new precedent as well.

34 posted on 11/14/2004 12:44:35 PM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson