Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
"At conception? Should the day-after pill be illegal?"

Yes. Yes. Refer to the GOP Platform or, if you are Catholic, the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church.

The said thing is that at this moment in time this is rather a moot issue that we should probably not fight about but rather go after the 2nd trimester abortions. Once those are taken care of or at least that process is started we can argue about morning after pills.

Morning after pills is a really sticky issue, because they are used heavily to treat rape victims, it's the first thing they hand you after the examination. The argument that a rape victim doesn't have the right to prevent the zygote from attaching itself to the uterine wall is going to be hard one to win. Which means that it will be possible for pretty much anyone to obtain the pill.

In fact, you won't catch me telling that to a rape victim. For the most part using rape victims in relation to the need for abortions is a straw man argument, but this is the one case where it is probably not.

-paridel
390 posted on 11/13/2004 10:30:14 AM PST by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: Paridel

If the "morning after pill" ought to be legal, then all abortion ought to be. Murder is murder. Moreover, it is an often DEADLY to the rape victim treatment, nor is it restricted now to just rape victims.


394 posted on 11/13/2004 10:33:31 AM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson