Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin; McGavin999
See #200.

Yes, please see the article from The New York Times that Howlin has posted. Please ignore that the NYT is an extremely biased, leftist, subversive piece of crap. They certainly don't have any agenda in this matter - like, maybe, causing some Republicans to publically question the contributions of the Christian voters in the last election.

211 posted on 11/13/2004 9:05:04 AM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff

It's from Pew Research. And for your information, Michael Barone has the exact same numbers; now, what's your objection to HIM??????

And what's the difference in looking at other articles, as opposed to just ones published by groups who have an agenda, except, of course, that YOU agree with them.

I am pro-life; but I detest one issue voters who constantly DEMAND that their views be put in front of everybody else's "or else."


218 posted on 11/13/2004 9:07:18 AM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: Spiff

Why don't you then address the facts and figures in the article, rather than attacking the source?

What you just did amounts to a concession of the facts stated in the article.


220 posted on 11/13/2004 9:07:44 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson