If, by "unreasonable," you mean that we refuse, under any circumstances, to rationalize murder, then color me loopy.
No I didn't mean by "unreasonable," that you refuse, under any circumstances, to rationalize murder. I'm not asking you to rationalize murder. That's a bit of a cheap shot and you probably know it. I'm asking you to balance two unalienable rights - liberty and life.
We all have a right to life as long as it doesn't infringe on another's liberty.
The liberty I'm refering to in this case is that of a raped woman to be secure in her own person. This is protected by the 4th Amendment.
By "unreasonable", I meant "unable to be reasoned with". Blind. What right do any of us have to use another's person (i.e. their physical bodies), absent their consent, to survive? Why grant the pre-born superior rights instead of equal rights?
If we can't survive without another's person, and we die because of it, no one has committed murder.
I can't believe that a reasonable person would fight against allowing a woman to stop another's seizure of her person under ANY circumstances.