[EternalVigilance]

Yes, "we" being all the voters, the vast majority of whom did not elect them to pursue a single issue.

Ah, that old lying liberal Republican canard: "single issue"...the feeble attempt to marginalize pro-lifers.

So once again I will state the actual fact: Most all pro-lifers care deeply about the broad range of issues that face the republic. They just happen to be wise enough to understand that the protection of innocent human life is the first and primary role of government.

[CWOJackson]

"Most all pro-lifers care deeply about the broad range of issues that face the republic."

Which is why most of them would not surrender their votes to a single issue party with no chance of winning.

[FreeReign]

Most all pro-lifers care deeply about the broad range of issues that face the republic. They just happen to be wise enough to understand that the protection of innocent human life is the first and primary role of government.

Unborn life is of primary importance to me. That's why I choose between the most electable candidates which one is most pro-life. I vote for that candidate.

In the last election in was Bush. So I voted Bush. Unborn life is too important to be messing around with an unelectable candidate.