Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRO-LIFE WARNING TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
A 2004 pro-life thread brought back to life | 11-13-04 | Vicomte13

Posted on 11/13/2004 6:05:41 AM PST by cpforlife.org

PRO-LIFE WARNING TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

We believe that abortion is infanticide, and that a holocaust of infants is taking place. We do not believe that there is any other issue on Earth that compares with abortion in moral import. And therefore, there is no policy or combination of policies you Republicans can offer, including perfect tax policies, tort reform, and every other thing that is near and dear to Republican hearts, that matters a damn if abortion is overlooked and allowed to slide by.

We know that this issue has to be settled in the Supreme Court, nowhere else. And we know that the opportunity to put new justices on the court comes once in a decade, maybe, and that the current opportunity to alter the complexion of the court is not going to come again for a generation. Therefore, the real possibility exists that abortion can finally be seriously curtailed, soon, by the Supreme Court changing Roe v. Wade or eliminating it...IF, and ONLY IF, we can get pro-life judges on that court.

To do that, we have trusted the Republicans for years. We just came out and voted for you again this time, in unprecedented numbers, because we are not stupid and we know what is at stake. Not just evangelicals either. The religious CATHOLIC vote went Republican in 2004, and they didn't do it because of trade policy or even gay marriage. Their issue is abortion.

And the overriding issue is abortion.

So, if the Republicans allow Senator Specter to get the Chair of the Judiciary Committee and he blocks pro-life nominees, or if the Republicans do not use the nuclear option to override Democrat filibusters of pro-life nominees, THIS TIME there is no place for Republicans to hide. WE KNOW that you have the power, now, because WE just voted to give it to you. We understand that you can block Specter. And we understand the nuclear option.

And therefore, we most certainly will understand that if you allow the pro-life judges to be blocked, that it will be your political CHOICE to have done so. You CAN put pro-life judges on the bench, if you expend a lot of political capital. This will offend some people - a lot of people. And that is the price you HAVE to pay to get our votes next time. You have to be willing to bet the whole house to end infanticide.

If not, we will not vote for you. We won't go running to vote for the Democrats: they're pro-abortion. We won't go out and form a third party: we're not stupid and know that won't work. We'll just stay home, just like we did in 2000. Except that in 2000 it was out of frustration and neglect, and the lack of belief that anything will change. There was no organized campaign to keep the pro-life vote home in 2000.

This time, it's different. We understand the system, and we know that you have the power. And we demand that you use the power straight down the line to fill the high court and the appellate courts with judges who will protect the lives of babies. Period. This is not negotiable. At all. This is why we voted for you. You have nothing with which to bargain with us, and if you screw us, we will stay organized and we will stay home purposely to destroy the Republican party. Because if you do not protect the babies when you have the power to do it, you are no better than the Democrats...and worse, you will have lied to us.

This means, in effect, that all of those things YOU care most about: taxation, immigration, trade and business policy, deregulation - all of those core issues that come as an economic package, are held hostage to our issue: babies. If you will not protect the babies, we will stay home and let the Democrats destroy everything that YOU believe in.

This is called "Chicken". It is called a "Mexican Standoff". And since we are fired up by the certitude that we are doing God's work in defending babies, we cannot be bought, and you cannot win so much as an election for dog catcher in this country without us.

Therefore, the solution is simple and obvious: give us what we voted for you to do. Give us pro-life judges. Use all of your power to do it. Sweep Specter out of the way: is he worth losing all the rest of your agenda? - because we really will stay home and throw the country to the Democrats if you're no better than they are on abortion, just to punish YOU for having betrayed us. When the filibusters come, and they will come, use the nuclear option to override them. That will poison the Senate, yes. So what? We are talking about babies here. And with our votes, militantly mobilized because we are winning, alongside of yours, in 2006 and 2008 and beyond, even if the Senate is poisoned, you will be able to replace it with a more Republican one.

That there is even a debate going on as to what to do with Specter is alarming, but we have had our hearts broken before, so we'll sit and pray and trust President Bush and Senator Frist and the Republicans to do the right thing.

Screw us, though, and we will turn on you and your whole agenda will go down the drain with the blood of the babies you wouldn't put your power on the line to save.

The easy solution, the win-win solution, is to BE as pro-life as you campaigned as being. Just do it.

I apologize for the length of this post. But it needed to be said. The Republicans do not seem to get it. They need to understand that we are more committed to saving babies than we are to the fortunes of the Republican Party. That Specter is still in play demonstrates that too many of them do not take this seriously.

Rather than test us, what you guys should do is simply cave, now, and give us what we want. Do that, and you wont hear from us again - there will be no creeping theocracy in America - because this is about the only religious issue that Catholics and Orthodox and Evangelicals AGREE on.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elections; gop; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,841-1,852 next last
To: Hildy

How come you haven't bothered to read or cite the GOP Platform Geo. Bush ran on? It is there. Pro-life.


881 posted on 11/13/2004 9:31:44 PM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

If Keyes could have dropped the "space ranger" stuff, it would have given him at least a competitive race with Obama.


882 posted on 11/13/2004 9:32:06 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Keyes, Illinois.

Folks like me all voted for Keyes in Illinois. All 1.37 million of them.

Folks like you followed the corrupt lead of Topinka and company and voted for Obama.

I can live with myself.

Can you?

883 posted on 11/13/2004 9:32:12 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

BUMP


884 posted on 11/13/2004 9:32:52 PM PST by bondserv (Alignment is critical! † [Check out my profile page])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

Comment #885 Removed by Moderator

To: Hildy

Then why hildy does the GOP have a pro-life platform? Is it to trick Christians into supporting you?


886 posted on 11/13/2004 9:33:34 PM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I guess we'll see, won't we? Since appr. 90% of the RAT Party is hardly worth fighting for - and whatever overinflated percentage of the GOP might not be worth fighting for - then we just might see.

And then you can blame "(insert Ross Perot GOP election losing excuse here)" instead of the GOP leadership and yourself! /s

But then, MOST RINOS (thought you grew up this election) feel pretty comfortable in RAT company, so...


887 posted on 11/13/2004 9:34:23 PM PST by ApesForEvolution ("We trust [RINO-BORKING-ABORTER] Sen. Arlen spRectum's word" - "IF spRectum gets the Chair, IF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

When folks like you start throwing labels around you are meaningless.


888 posted on 11/13/2004 9:34:32 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Yes, before long, people will start getting suspended."

For what? Telling lies about posters? Calling them names?


889 posted on 11/13/2004 9:34:43 PM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
I'm not into the blame game; as Bush says, "It is what it is."

But then, MOST RINOS (thought you grew up this election) feel pretty comfortable in RAT company, so...

Sneer when you say that, boy.

890 posted on 11/13/2004 9:36:22 PM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: narses

The RINO idol, bobdole, set the precedent IIRC: "what GOP platform?".

Freaking idiots...


891 posted on 11/13/2004 9:36:26 PM PST by ApesForEvolution ("We trust [RINO-BORKING-ABORTER] Sen. Arlen spRectum's word" - "IF spRectum gets the Chair, IF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Looks like you are the one about to shoot emotionally off her rocker. The majority of Americans (let alone, the majority of GOP) are in disagreement with at least some portion of the scope of Roe.
892 posted on 11/13/2004 9:37:07 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You voted for Keyes? Did you move to Illinois?


893 posted on 11/13/2004 9:37:09 PM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
While I agree wholeheartedly with the feeling and intent of your message, please think for a moment about the potential consequences of your warning: If we simply sit out an election in protest, we contribute to the win of Liberals. This means only MORE abortion, in addition to the rest. Yes, we need to pressure them, but sitting out an election will accomplish nothing. Vote, and vote for those who support your ideas. If the existing elected servants won't do the job, vote for somebody else next time.

Not voting is exactly the same as a vote for the winner.

894 posted on 11/13/2004 9:37:19 PM PST by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

All pearly whites, girl... :)


895 posted on 11/13/2004 9:37:26 PM PST by ApesForEvolution ("We trust [RINO-BORKING-ABORTER] Sen. Arlen spRectum's word" - "IF spRectum gets the Chair, IF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

And those parts have been addressed, haven't they?


896 posted on 11/13/2004 9:39:04 PM PST by Hildy (The really great men are always simple and true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 892 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Do us a favor...GO...leave the party, start your own party. Then you'll be able to prove, once and for all, that the majority of people in this country are anti-abortion. You're so sure of it, aren't ya?

If we left the GOP, the GOP would cease to exist.

But there is no reason for us to leave our pro-life party.

As soon as you leftists manage to remove the pro-life platform, or even come within a thousand miles of getting a pro-death monster nominated as VP or POTUS, come talk to me. I'll believe you then that your heinous views have prevailed.

Til then, you're a bad joke.

897 posted on 11/13/2004 9:39:31 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

What labels? I don't see no steenkin labels.


898 posted on 11/13/2004 9:39:35 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 888 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
We would like a Court which will address at least this overreach of Roe, for starters. Who elected that infamous court king?
899 posted on 11/13/2004 9:41:14 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; cpforlife.org
Really? Let me repeat, You asked:

When were you elected spokesperson for the GOP and the pro-life movement?

I asked:

Since the GOP Platform is congruent with his post, why isn't the onus on you to answer that question?

You responded with:

What question?

There are several pointless, empty threats, but no questions.

Well, the question is simple. The post by cpforlife.org is totally congruent with the GOP Platform. You challeneged him with "When were you elected spokesperson for the GOP ...", and I pointed out that the GOP Platform and this thread agree. So who elected YOU spokesman for the GOP in your efforts to refute the Platform and this post?

900 posted on 11/13/2004 9:42:23 PM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,841-1,852 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson