[konaice]

"They said it was not immediately clear if arsonists were behind the attack."

How can this writer suggest arsonists were NOT to blame and yet still call it an attack?

Journalists.... {/disgust}

[jocon307]

"How can this writer suggest arsonists were NOT to blame and yet still call it an attack?"

LOL, good catch!

Lend me an editor!

[The_Media_never_lie]

"They said it was not immediately clear if arsonists were behind the attack."

Agreed. Maybe they were demolitionists involved in an attack they horribly botched.

[PAR35]

How can this writer suggest arsonists were NOT to blame and yet still call it an attack?

Don't forget this line:

was set on fire

It was "set on fire" in an "attack" but they have no idea if it was arson.

It's not that I mind liberals being stupid; I am offended when they assume that we are.

[July 4th]

How can this writer suggest arsonists were NOT to blame and yet still call it an attack?

I have a friend whose garage and part of his home burned down after the wiring in his garage was attacked by squirrels.