Michael Peroutka's Acceptance Speech

Constitution Party Website ^ | 2003 | MICHAEL PEROUTKA

[Joe Hadenuf]

Aren't you a member of the local illegal alien union?

[GeronL]

Why exactly was this posted??.. I wonder how his Presidential election victory party went?

[Joe Hadenuf]

Why don't you ask the guy that posted it. LOL..

[GeronL]

Nah. The answer is just not that important to me right now.

[ClintonBeGone]

Commie Basher also agrees with Clinton and John Kerry that the War on Terror is not about war, but is about law enforcement and going through international organizations.

If that's true, then CB's confirmed that there are no limits to the ignorance of certain posters on the internet. I didn't think I would find one that could beat Libertarianinexile.

[mcg1969]

Ah, I missed that :)

[PersonalLiberties]

I read the first page on this thread and am surprised that conservatives dismiss this as a yawn, or clown. I am scared for our republic. Perhaps this is now radical conservatism vs. present day compassionate conservatism. The sad thing is the majority of the ideas expressed used to be main stream conservative.

[The Hollywood Conservative]

What does the "Esq." used by 90% of the lawyers really mean? Look up which country it denotes subjugation to!



It means you need to get your tinfoil hat loosened up.

Im an "esq." and it doesn't mean a damned thing. Same with fringe on the flag and all the other new world order, black helicopter, tinfoil hat garbage.

[steplock]

Interesting that you did NOT answer the question!

[The Hollywood Conservative]

Please. I was a registered Libertarian for 8 years. I LEFT the party because I saw it getting taken over by paranoids like yourself.

I use Esq. because we are the only country in the world that doesn't recognize those with a doctorate in law as "DOCTORS." If you have a doctorate in Art, you're a Doctor. If you have a doctorate in Home Economics, you're a doctor. But a Doctor of laws is either "esquire" or "attorney at law". Since I don't REALLY practice law anymore, using "attorney at law" is a bit misleading. But I wasn't to get some (ECONOMIC) use out of the $100,000 I spent getting the degree, I use "ESQUIRE." Yes... I have more education, which equals more respect and more money. Thus I let people I'm in business with KNOW I have a law degree, and that's where ESQ. comes in. I know there are all sorts of loony ass ideas floating around the web, but they are ridiculous. You are being used. And not by the secret world of Esq., but by people willing to pander to your paranoia to sell everything from books, to bomb shelters, to gold bullion at overly inflated prices.

And of course use it because it gets me in to the cool secret meetings we all go to, where we plot to take over the world... But I shouldn't have told you about those...

[mcg1969]

Indie---sounds like you and I are in agreement on certain fundamental. As my posts reveal, I disagree strongly with the third-party strategy, because of its potential to backfire by serving as a spoiler. But at least that's just a disagreement on strategy. Those who claim that voting Conservative is "voting on principle" and voting Republican is "blind obedience" are just being silly.

[Scholastic]

Thanks for the post, indeed very much wisdom! Its interesting and thought provoking to read even after the election. Thanks for your post and the kind remarks for Peroutka.