[dubie]

I did not say there was no crime. I am saying you can't prove Scott did it without physical evidence he committed a crime. No matter how guilty you want him to be, the case against him was weak. He is guilty of being the husband of a women who was murdered. As much as it "looks" like he did it and most would conclude he did, there is no proof he did.

[DB]

That isn't how it works.