To: Howlin
The evidence is all circumstantial, except for one hair. I disagree. Scott placing his alibi at the very place the bodies were found IS physical evidence.
331 posted on
11/12/2004 12:05:39 PM PST by
Types_with_Fist
(I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
To: Types_with_Fist
Yeah, that's true; I was speaking of actual evidence; my husband and I were just talking about this; if he strangled me, wrapped me in a tarp, and got rid of my body in a car or truck we both used, what WOULD the evidence be? Zippo.
343 posted on
11/12/2004 12:06:48 PM PST by
Howlin
(I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
To: Types_with_Fist
The defense explantion is not outside the realm of possibility. The case did get a lot of publicity from the very beginning.
354 posted on
11/12/2004 12:09:36 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson