To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
That's bad. Replace two jurors and come back with a verdict that fast?
Sounds like not guilty.
17 posted on
11/12/2004 11:27:15 AM PST by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Bikers4Bush
Definately guilty. The two replaced jurors were the hold-outs. Guilty - murder 1.
To: Bikers4Bush
That's bad. Replace two jurors and come back with a verdict that fast? Sounds like not guilty.
Thats just what i was thinking but i hope i am wrong
65 posted on
11/12/2004 11:31:45 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
To: Bikers4Bush
That's bad. Replace two jurors and come back with a verdict that fast? Sounds like not guilty. Funny that sounds like guilty to me.
151 posted on
11/12/2004 11:40:23 AM PST by
tophat9000
(We didn’t rise They Sunk Look at the blue, water filled, sink holes map (Mike Moore Fatass divots ?))
To: Bikers4Bush
In the Bizzaro world that is today's media, it will be appealed all the way to the USSC where the newly seated Justice Arlen Specter will rule 'not proved'.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson