Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iconoclast; Max7
How could it have taken such a short time for the (new) jury to come to a verdict with the new people on it.

IT WAS A SLAM DUNK!, that's why.

Believe it or not, I've seen 'em come back in twenty minutes. Just enough time to pick a chair and elect a foreman, then all look at each other and say, "Uh-huh."

I've never served on a jury (never voir dired, never got out of the jury assembly room), but my husband is a popular juror. He's served on six or seven juries in the Atlanta metro area - usually elected foreman. He had one criminal trial where they did exactly that - chose a foreman and spent five minutes figuring out how to fill in the verdict form. Of course the guy was incredibly guilty - robbed a convenience store, tried to run over a policeman in the parking lot, high speed chase, wrecked the car, found unconscious in the driver's seat with the money in a bag beside him. It's like "Why did you bother?" Probably to stay out on bail.

1,415 posted on 11/12/2004 2:01:57 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1391 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

The judge should not have allowed the jumping in the boat. This will mean Scott gets an appeal


1,424 posted on 11/12/2004 2:03:47 PM PST by MaryJaneNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson