Skip to comments.
UNITED NATIONS ESTABLISHES WORKING GROUP ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE
www.un.org ^
| 11/11/2004
| UN Idiot
Posted on 11/12/2004 10:49:53 AM PST by B4Ranch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: Calpernia; Smartass
Looks like we're making nice with NATO. Maybe if we can't prosecute Anan and his fellow monetary murderers at the UN, we can bomb them
61
posted on
11/12/2004 7:17:38 PM PST
by
Lady Jag
(YAHOOO!!! W2!!!)
To: Smartass
We should boot them out of NY and let the city take possession of the city for some real revenues.
62
posted on
11/12/2004 7:20:14 PM PST
by
Lady Jag
(YAHOOO!!! W2!!!)
To: B4Ranch
As effective as the UN has been at, well, anything I'm somehow not too worried about them taking over the internet.
63
posted on
11/12/2004 7:42:23 PM PST
by
edchambers
("Rock n Roller with one foot in the grave")
To: Lady Jag; Calpernia
At the present, Koffi and the UN are stonewalling a
U.S. Senate investigation. Again, because the Oil
for Food debacle occurred here, federal statutes trump
the UN. whereas, they could be prosecuted under a number of statutes. RICO for one comes to mind.
64
posted on
11/12/2004 7:46:11 PM PST
by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY to 2008 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
To: edchambers
>>As effective as the UN has been at, well, anything I'm somehow not too worried about them taking over the internet.<<
Really? You think they are ineffective huh? Have you heard of the EPA or the ESA? The ideas were theirs, but it is our system of government that does the enforcing for them. And we do a damn good job of enforcement!
65
posted on
11/12/2004 7:56:36 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: spodefly
Thanks for posting my favorite picture.
66
posted on
11/12/2004 8:04:02 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: mo
Attention! The first release of JAP is downloadable free of charge and already protects your privacy against most observers like your ISP, your network operator, or your boss. However, this version does not yet achieve the full security and anonymity that we strive for. It does not protect you against an adversary who has the capability to observe all communication links on the Internet. Very soon it will be considered "normal" for government to use their capability to observe all communication links on the Internet. Hint-Patriot Act II
67
posted on
11/12/2004 8:09:40 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: MarshallDillon
My list would get us both Put in jail
68
posted on
11/12/2004 8:12:10 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: B4Ranch
Amazingly enough we Americans who invented and developed the internet are ceding control of it to third world and communist despots. Time for us to get out of the UN and get the UN out of the US.
69
posted on
11/12/2004 8:14:05 PM PST
by
RightWingConspirator
(Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda/Fraud Kerry are not my senators.)
To: B4Ranch
I guess Kofi and his fellow thugs feel they need to replace the gravy train that they lost when we put Saddam Hussein out of business. These people are crooks and frauds of the worst kind. They literally stole money and food from the mouths of starving children, and we need to finally drop the charade, call them by their true names, and at the very least dissolve this band of freeloading gangsters, once and for all.
To: B4Ranch
We've known all along that the puppet masters would eventually
move to establish rigid tyrannical control over the net threat to their existence and propaganda.
This last election only motivates them to hasten that ugly day.
I don't think there's much we can do but pray and sabotage such efforts however we may. Clever people will probably have many such ways for some time to come. But the puppet masters will make it increasingly difficult to impossible.
And, some of us are probably on their FOSTERIZING list, already.
71
posted on
11/12/2004 8:16:21 PM PST
by
Quix
(PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
To: EagleUSA
"This is beyond incredible..."
You really don't have to worry. The U.N. is powerless to stop the internet. Why? Because if they stop this internet we can simply begin another one. The U.N. is history as far as the free distribution of information is concerned. And I really don't think it can stop the existing internet anyway.
72
posted on
11/12/2004 8:16:52 PM PST
by
groanup
(Gay-bashing? No, it was Kerry-bashing, 59 million strong.)
To: B4Ranch
We've known all along that the puppet masters would eventually
move to establish rigid tyrannical control over the net threat to their existence and propaganda.
This last election only motivates them to hasten that ugly day.
I don't think there's much we can do but pray and sabotage such efforts however we may. Clever people will probably have many such ways for some time to come. But the puppet masters will make it increasingly difficult to impossible.
And, some of us are probably on their FOSTERIZING list, already.
73
posted on
11/12/2004 8:17:31 PM PST
by
Quix
(PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
To: Smartass
Do you think anyone will prosecuted all they've done? They'd never get what I would sentence them with. I'm not all that knowledgeable on all the UN shenanigans, but what I have heard is horrid. I'm too cynical; all the bad guys are getting off Scot free this millennium.
74
posted on
11/12/2004 8:23:39 PM PST
by
Lady Jag
(YAHOOO!!! W2!!!)
To: Quix
I don't think there's much we can do but pray and sabotage such efforts however we may. Doesn't it just suck that no mater who wins the elections, we still move inexorably towards tyranny?
To: Smartass; Lady Jag
>>>You're right on...Lady Jag is absolutely great.
She keeps coming up some goodies!
This was a goody; but you, Smartass, have been the direct cause of many ruined keyboards :)
76
posted on
11/12/2004 8:33:16 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Lady Jag
Bombing is good.
But what is up with not prosecuting any of these HEAD TERRORISTS?
77
posted on
11/12/2004 8:34:13 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Smartass
>>>Again, because the Oil for Food debacle occurred here, federal statutes trump the UN. whereas, they could be prosecuted under a number of statutes. RICO for one comes to mind.
Does this mean we CAN prosecute these people?
78
posted on
11/12/2004 8:38:50 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
Gadddd, ruined keyboards, I hate to hear that. I would
hope I made some people laugh more than cry!
79
posted on
11/12/2004 8:42:38 PM PST
by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY to 2008 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
To: B4Ranch
The U.N. wants the power and freedom of getting funding automatically, thereby removing U.S. control, and the U.S. veto. If we leave the U.N. we should outlaw it, and refuse to import goods from any nation that supports them.
The globalists cannot control American conservatives as long as they are free to communicate on the Internet. If we can be taxed, we can also be controlled, refused service, banned, prosecuted.
If they have anything to say about it, this will be given, so what say we don't let them have anything to say about it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson