Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Askel5
Only if he were to actually appoint a man of integrity to a spot where defense of human life were critical would I be troubled ... I'd have one hell of a time trying to figure that one out.

John Ashcroft.

We're waiting................oh I guess you're still "figuring" ...... you'll probably be figuring for a long long while now.

40 posted on 11/12/2004 9:30:30 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
=== John Ashcroft.

Oh, give me a break.

I'm sure I can find even more cites for you of his making perfectly clear from the get-go what WAS and WAS NOT on the agenda of the Administration whose FIRST order of business was doubling the budget of the NIH and legitimizing with "do as I say, not as I do" state funding the Human Farming without which there is no such thing as ESCR.

For now, this one will have to do.

On Wednesday, however, under extreme pressure (sic), Ashcroft said that he would not attempt to overturn Roe v.Wade and that he considered it the “settled law of the land.” Further, he said that he does not believe that George W. Bush intends to challenge Roe.

Republican National Coalition for Life

Try again, sucker.

139 posted on 11/12/2004 10:33:50 AM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson