Did you miss the sarcasm in post 359? We were laughing at you and your equally hysterical buddies.
Post 325 is tedious, boring and has nothing to do with Gonzales' suitability to the position of AG. Why did you want me to read that one?
What does your opinion in post 350 have to do with anything?
I believe your assessment of Bush is dead wrong.
As far as post 184 goes. I have read that entire site previously based on one of your posts.
Do you think I don't know exactly what abortion is? Do you think I am pro-choice?
I'm strongly pro-life. Strongly.
And I think you are wrong about Gonzales.
I am ready for my next reading assignment.
But why don't you do what I suggested and READ THE OTHER POSTS ON THIS THREAD. THE ONES THAT DON'T AGREE WITH YOU.
You could really learn something.
One more time. The AG doesn't make make law.
Focus on the law makers.
Whining about every minor thing just labels you a whiner.
Spend your political energy wisely.
texasflower you and I can keep telling each other the following lines:
"I'm strongly pro-life. Strongly.
And I think you are wrong about Gonzales."
I hope I am wrong about Gonzalas. 397 gives reason to think that I may be wrong. We won't know till time passes.
I am very glad that you are strongly Pro-Life. Let's not allow this disagreement to divide us on our cause. If you are Pro-Life we are on the same side.