To: Coleus
So, if he had the "choice" he could have chosen life instead of death, No?No, he didn't have the choice. He couldn't interpret the law in a more restrictive manner than the Legislature intended. The lower courts did.
Legislating from the bench is bad.
2 deaths, the fetus and the potential of the girl getting breast cancer in the future.
You know, bringing in junk science is not going to help the pro-life movement.
269 posted on
11/12/2004 1:17:59 PM PST by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Poohbah
You know, bringing in junk science is not going to help the pro-life movement. >>>
And neither is talking to you. Junk science? Now I know you don't know what you are talking about, LOL. The science is irrefutable.
272 posted on
11/12/2004 1:20:10 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson