Let's assume for the sake of argument that that is what he would have been doing. Nevertheless, he would still be obligated to disregard a law that decriminalizes grievous intrinsic evil.
The law as written was upheld, it was the after the fact actions that were in question. As I understand it. That was where the problem lies.<p. I want a judge that is a strict constitutionalist. There by when Roe V Wade finally makes it to the supremes it will be held unconstitutional. and the nightmare of abortion will be ended. We can't be guilty of the same thing we are screaming at the lefties for doing.