Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
In effect, it did. It was up to individuals to define the meaninging of life, and all that.

Not at all. It removed the protection of the law from a class of humans. It did not redefine the meaning of life or what is or is not a human.

The judges' failure to protect innocent unborn life in law is a grievous sin of ommission equal in magnitude to a positive command to mass murder.

Most states allow people absolute impunity under the law to use deadly force with intruders. Occasionally, innocent people are killed because of this. Is this also a sin of omission?

170 posted on 11/12/2004 11:10:50 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Hermann the Cherusker
Most states allow people absolute impunity under the law to use deadly force with intruders. Occasionally, innocent people are killed because of this. Is this also a sin of omission?

You're kidding, right? When did you become a cavilling lawyer?

176 posted on 11/12/2004 11:20:06 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson