Posted on 11/12/2004 7:48:39 AM PST by COUNTrecount
Arafats Undeserved Honor: The Wests Shame
November 12, 2004
by Elan Journo
What made Yasir Arafats final days appalling was not the farcical prevarications about whether he were dead or alive, nor the soap-opera quarrel between his wife and his political cronies; it was that so evil a man commanded so much respect.
Since his airlift to a Paris hospital, as the welcomed guest of the French government and with throngs of journalists on the scene, Arafats death has been presented as the heartbreaking end of a noble man. Reacting to a premature report of Arafats death, President Bush wished that God bless his soul. Upon Arafats death, Jacques Chirac lauded him as "a man of courage and conviction. The French gave him a military salute as Arafats coffin was sent to his funeral in Egypt, which many heads of state are expected to attend.
Why do the Wests politicians hold in such high esteem a man who unleashed a ferocious campaign of international terrorism that, across a span of forty years, has claimed the lives of thousands of Israeli, Lebanese, Jordanian, Palestinian, and American civilians?
Arafat specialized in high-profile attacks targeting civilians, in order to inflict the severest psychological devastation. The slaughter of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics; the assassination of American diplomats in Sudan; the massacre of school children in Maalot, Israel (a model for the recent mass murder at a high school in Beslan, Russia); the hijacking of the cruise ship Achille Lauro, in which wheelchair-bound American Leon Klinghoffer was tossed overboard--Arafat was responsible for these and hundreds of other kidnappings, car-bombings, hijackings, and brutal murders. Also, during the 1970s he fomented bloody civil wars in Jordan and Lebanon.
But did he not renounce his terrorist ways later in life (as though this would be enough to earn forgiveness)?
Certainly in the 1990s European and American politicians embraced Arafat as a peacemaker, granting him recognition as a statesman. President Clinton met with him more often than with any other international leader (24 times in eight years). And in 1994 Arafat co-won the Nobel Peace Prize. But his willingness to make peace with Israel was a transparent lie. Though he publicly renounced terrorism in words addressed to Western audiences, he never did so in action (nor even in words, when speaking to the Arab world).
From the outset Arafat flouted practically every provision of a 1993 peace accord--most notably the provision to quell terrorism against Israel. The vast armed police force he created actually conspired with and often actively supported terrorists. And, calling for martyrs by the millions, Arafat fostered the deployment of suicide bombers. In 2001 he told the family of one bomber: The heroic martyrdom operation [of the man] who turned his body into a bomb [is] the model of manhood and sacrifice for the sake of Allah and the homeland.
None of this dissuaded Western leaders (including President Bush, who sought to marginalize Arafat somewhat) from supporting the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state in areas governed by Arafats provisional Palestinian Authority. And this was so even though the evidence was abundant that such a state would become a sponsor of terrorism. In 2002, for example, Arafats forces were caught trying to smuggle into the Gaza Strip 50 tons of weapons and ammunitions, including one ton of C-4 explosives, and more than 60 Katyusha rockets, capable of hitting most cities in Israel.
Politicians eager to regard Arafat as a heroic liberator of Palestinians were also undaunted by his dictatorial rule over the Palestinian Authority. That governing body systematically violates the rights of its citizens. Arafats police force--eight or so competing gangs of thugs--arbitrarily arrests citizens, confiscates property, and murders his political opponents. (The victims were denounced under the catch-all charge of collaborating with Israel.) The PAs chaotic judiciary made a mockery of the rule of law; its judges served not justice, but Arafat.
But far from condemning Arafats vicious rule, the European Union and America supported it with hundreds of millions of dollars in aid.
This extravagant tolerance of Arafat, given his blood-soaked record, is not due to ignorance on the part of our politicians. It comes from the precept that moral judgment is an obstacle to action. This is the view that moral principles are an impediment to achieving practical aims, such as peace. One should, on this view, remain morally neutral--even though one side may be clearly in the right--and try to engage both sides in gentlemanly negotiation--even though one side may be a murderous thug.
Because moral neutrality is such an obviously immoral policy, its perpetrators must blacken the good while whitewashing the evil. Hence, world leaders condemn Israel, the innocent victim who refuses to submit, and lionize Arafat, the ruthless killer.
Arafats elevation to the dignity of a peace-seeking statesman is due to our politicians moral corruption. Were he judged properly, Arafat would long ago have been dealt the punishment he deserved. By sustaining him and perpetuating the delusion that Arafat was really a well-meaning statesman, politicians committed treason to his innocent victims.
Elan Journo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Elan Journo is a writer and editor for the Ayn Rand Institute (ARI), in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead. Send reactions to reaction@aynrand.org
Exactly -- the U.S. is just as responsible for the proliferation of this maggot's reign of terror, as any other country. At least Bush finally started treating this bottom-feeder the way he should have been treated a long time ago --
Meanwhile, Carter and Clinton are putting on thier knee pads....what a couple of fools...
I suspect that for many it wasn't 'respect' -- just ghoulish fascination or the satisfaction in knowing that the SOB was really dead!
There were similar accolades for Joseph Vissarionovich when he died in 1953. The very same man responsible for the murder of over 30 million of his own people.
Women used to flock to his side when he was alive; even Polina Molotov whom Stalin had put away in prison, upon being released after Stalin died asked about him and when told he had died, she fainted.
For whatever reason, tyrants seem to act as aphrodiziacs to many women and men too I guess.
Did Jimmy Carter attend the funeral? Did he wear the Nobel "Peace Prize" medal around his neck? What did Katie Couric wear? How about Barbra Streisand--did she send her special roses? Did Hillary kiss Suha at the funeral? The TV reports never tell you what you really want to know.
Katie's black dress o'mourning is really getting a workout the last couple of weeks.
Only Charles Krauthammer has had the courage to tell the truth about Arafat and the United Nations members...they all want the annihilation of Israel. That was Arafats one and only determination to call him anything less than a terrorist, a murderer, the systematic destruction of Israel and the Jewish people genocide of that race was his objective and the objective of the United Nations.
People of the Jewish race or faith, take notice of who is lauding the King of Terrorists
know who your true friends are
your enemies are known to all.
People of the Jewish race or faith, take notice of who is lauding the King of Terrorists
know who your true friends are
your enemies are known to all.
====
Well stated...and most of the American Jew vote went for KERRY!!! Now go figure? What is wrong with these people..who do the Jews think is supporting Israel?? It sure as heck is not the far-left who was sleeping with Arafat...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.