Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nov3
Isn't Congress required by the Constitution to give the President its "advice and consent" on nominations? That it must give him a yea or nay on his candidates?

A filibuster on these candidates gives the President nothing. That's not the way I read Article II, Section 2.

9 posted on 11/12/2004 7:23:22 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

I agree. I believe that to filibuster a Presidential nominee, as opposed to a law, is unconstitutional. But it doesn't matter what I think. It only matters what the SC thinks.


12 posted on 11/12/2004 7:26:06 AM PST by Pfesser (Georgia: The 1st Red State called.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson