Lets just hope that Drunkard Kennedy retires!
Can anyone post which ones are safe and competitive so we can see what chances we have of gaining or losing?
And I heard Frist wants to retire in 2006. I am not sure though.
Could Romney take Taxachussets if Kennedy retires?
Your list is incomplete
California (Feinstein-D) - Feinstein is in her 70s and may retire, or she might run for governor. Possible opponents include Condoleezza Rice (R), Rep. Doug Ose, state Sen. Tom McClintock, Rep. Darrell Issa and Rep. George Radanovich.
We definitely have a shot if we field the right candidate. I think we need to find someone who Arnold would support. Condi? Issa is also possible.
----
Connecticut (Lieberman-D) - Lieberman will be 64 in election year. After losing his bid for the presidential nomination in 2004, he may call it quits. However, if he runs, he's safe.
I AGREE...Lieberman is safe, don't see any chance here.
-----
Indiana (Lugar-R) - Lugar is safe if he runs again, although he'll be 76 in election year and he may retire.
He may retire, and we'll hold the seat either way.
From your lips to God's ears! We would give a real pro-life, Pro-Christ conservative running, against the queen of infanticide, all the help a fledgling on line paper can give and then some.
From your lips to God's ears! We would give a real pro-life, Pro-Christ conservative running, against the queen of infanticide, all the help a fledgling on line paper can give and then some.
Lott has already decided to run again in '06.
http://www.thehill.com/campaign/111004_lott.aspx
Rep. Mike Rogers is already planning a run against Debbie Stabenow. He won her old House seat when she was elected to the Senate. Rogers is a star, while Stabenow is an embarrassment. Rogers should win this race.
I think we will see a large number of retirements by the Senators in their 70s and 80s, especially the Democrats who know they have little chance of being in the majority again.
Sadly enough, Teddy K is not going anywhere. Mitt Romney was the GOP's best shot against him back in '94 and Kennedy won that race going away.
I'd keep a close eye on Ben Nelson in Nebraska. I would not be at all surprised to see him switch parties considering that Governor Johanns is warming to the idea of a Senate run. If Johanns decides to run, that will be the big race to watch. Since Nelson usually votes with the GOP anyway, he may crossover rather than risk losing his seat to the popular Republican governor.
She'll be 73 then. If she runs, she'll win easiliy. Boxer was the weak candidate. Rice would have a better shot as a woman and a 'moderate' on abortion-rights. Sadly, the fools would selected McClintock in the primary and he'd lose in a landslide on par with this year's Obama vs. Keyes. A CONSERVATIVE cannot win statewide at this time. Bank on it.
We need a fiscal conservative who is more libertarian on social issues. And, if at all possible, it should *not* be a rich white guy (take note, Issa!).
In Maryland (90% Dem)the best idea might be for Pubbies to change parties & nominate a conservative Dem against Sarbanes. Even with several good solid Pubbie counties we just can't pry Mikulski & Sarbanes out of office. We have tried.
Thay are belong to uss'ns
This should be job # 1 for all of us.
Bump off any 5 of these 7 Democrat senate seats
in 2006 and you have the magic 60 seat advantage.
-
FLORIDA - Bill Nelson is vulnerable
NEBRASKA - Ben Nelson is vulnerable
NEW MEXICO - Jeff Bingaman
NORTH DAKOTA - Kent Conrad is vulnerable
MINNESOTA - Mark Dayton
WEST VIRGINIA - Robert Byrd
WISCONSIN - Herb Kohl
-