[KwasiOwusu]

"Right-oh, Captain Barnabus. Unless, of course, you count the original article. The facts are right there, and the logical conclusion is drawn out. You've failed to disprove said logical conclusion. "

Nope.
Its like hearing the Prosecution in a court case and not hearing th Defense.
Those "facts" you talk about are just an anonymous post on an internet board.
What we need is to hear from Microsoft on the matter.
I bet they make your "facts" look like so much eyewash. :)

[Darksheare]

Wrong.
This isn't court, and this isn't a case.
This is simple computer stuff.
It's been explained to you already.
You fail to read or accept it, one or the other.
Not our problem.
You should run along to some discussion you know something about.

[K1avg]

Its like hearing the Prosecution in a court case and not hearing th Defense.

Since you seem to be the only one disagreeing here, I think it's reasonable to consider you "the Defense." All I can say is, we're waiting.

Those "facts" you talk about are just an anonymous post on an internet board.

Of course. That's how we know Jason Dowdell is the author.

What we need is to hear from Microsoft on the matter. I bet they make your "facts" look like so much eyewash.

Indeed. They'll fess up the same way Scott Peterson did.